Independent quantitative research

See the market event.
Understand the evidence.

RavenInvestor turns structured market signals into clear, carefully sourced analysis—without hype or prediction theater.

BTCUSDT four-hour resistance breaks over 365 days: 205 breaks, 141 long simulations, 66 target exits, 75 stops and a +28.31% sum; lower bars show each trade result.

Bitcoin resistance breaks: 141 simulated longs sum to +28.31%

The study records 66 winners and 75 losers, yet a positive sum of trade results. Repeated entries during the same price move and excluded costs limit what that sum says about an investable strategy.

Read the analysis

Latest analysis

One event, fully examined.

View the archive →
Oct 27
2026
Bitcoin support breaks: 128 simulated shorts sum to -16.13%Bitcoin
Oct 23
2026
Bitcoin closes in the lower half of its Bollinger Bands, with width at 4.69%Bitcoin
Oct 22
2026
Bitcoin’s 14 analogs show a positive 60-day median between negative 30- and 90-day resultsHistorical analysis
Oct 14
2026
Colombia’s recent inflation pace slows, while the 12-month rate remains above a year earlierInflation
Oct 12
2026
Bitcoin’s eight historical analogs show a negative 30-day median and a positive 90-day medianHistorical analysis
Oct 9
2026
Mexico’s August inflation rises monthly, while January–August accumulation remains below 2025Inflation
Oct 7
2026
Monthly 100 USDT purchases end up 12.77%, despite a negative BTC price windowBitcoin

Our standard

Evidence before narrative.

Observed dataClearly separated from interpretation.

Reproducible methodsSources, timestamps, assumptions, and limitations.

No certainty claimsNo personalized advice and no guaranteed outcomes.

RavenInvestor Learn

Understand the tools behind the analysis.

Explore all guides →

Built to compound

Every important event becomes historical evidence.

RavenInvestor preserves significant market events as durable case studies. As the archive grows, future analysis can compare new conditions with transparent historical samples instead of relying on memory or generic commentary.

Read our methodology